Back to content

Decision framework

Satellite vs drone vs phone for BC vineyard and berry scouting

A practical BC-focused chooser for when to use satellite, drone, or phone-based field confirmation.

Satellite Analysis 5 min read Farmbit Field Team · Updated 2026-08-24

Section 1

Satellite for the first ranking

Use satellite when the question is broad: which block deserves the first walk, which area changed relative to its neighbours, or whether a follow-up is worth planning. It is efficient for screening but too broad to replace row-level confirmation.

Section 2

Drone for shape and boundaries

Use a drone when a block already earned attention and the remaining question is spatial: where a pattern starts, how it follows rows, or whether a boundary explains the contrast. Decide the capture question before scheduling the pass.

Section 3

Phone for visible proof

Use a phone when the question has narrowed to something the team can see and record in the row. A short photo or note can connect the remote signal to ground conditions, but it is still evidence from one visit, not a universal diagnosis.

Section 4

Choose the smallest useful combination

Start with the satellite pass, confirm on the ground, and add drone or closer photos only if that evidence would change a field decision. Extra capture that does not change the action still costs money.

Next move

Inspect the sample run after you read the guide.

The guide explains the logic. The completed sample run shows whether Farmbit turns that logic into a field-ready brief.

More guides